Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1737/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1737/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-1 v. Kamlesh Manohar Kanungo

High Court 09 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1737/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-1 v. Kamlesh Manohar Kanungo
Date of order
09 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/1737/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-1 v. Kamlesh Manohar Kanungo, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

jsn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1730 OF 2017 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2548 OF 2017WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1737 OF 2017ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2547 OF 2017WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1739 OF 2017ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2546 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income – Central - 1VersusKamlesh Manohar Kanungo … Appellant…Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar, for Appellant / Applicant. PC:- CORAM:DATED: M.S.SANKLECHA &RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.9TH FEBRUARY 2018 1.None appears for the Respondent inspite of service. 2.Mr. Suresh Kumar, the learned counsel for the Appellant tenders Affidavits of Service dated 2nd February 2018 in all three Appeals. The Affidavits of Service taken on record. These Notices of Motion seek condonation of delay of 42 days in filing the three Appeals from the common order of the Tribunal dated 28th February 2017. 3.We have perused the Affidavits of Service and are satisfied with the reasons stated therein for the delay in filing the Appeals. 4.Accordingly, the Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of clause (a). ( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan