In Nma/174/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. M/S. Suredha Holdings P. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: REBELLO, J.) PC 1.As the Notice of motion for condonation ofdelay has been dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.Refund of court fee as per rules.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
is not sufficient cause. Hence, Notice of motion is
dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
PC 1.As the Notice of motion for condonation ofdelay has been dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.Refund of court fee as per rules. Certified copy
:
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.