Case LawHigh Court › Nma/174/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/174/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. M/S. Suredha Holdings P. Ltd

High Court 03 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/174/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. M/S. Suredha Holdings P. Ltd
Date of order
03 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/174/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. M/S. Suredha Holdings P. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: REBELLO, J.) PC 1.As the Notice of motion for condonation ofdelay has been dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.Refund of court fee as per rules.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
is not sufficient cause. Hence, Notice of motion is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) PC 1.As the Notice of motion for condonation ofdelay has been dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.Refund of court fee as per rules. Certified copy : (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan