Nma/1747/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Infrastructure Leasing And Finance Services Limited
High Court
16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1747/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Infrastructure Leasing And Finance Services Limited
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1747/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Infrastructure Leasing And Finance Services Limited, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1747 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.950 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1747 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.950 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Infrastructure Leasing & Finance
Services Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.S.G.Dalal for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 273 days in preferring
the appeal. There is affidavit in support filed by
Mrs.C.K.K.Nair. Respondents has been served. There is
no affidavit opposing the same. In the instant case,
we find that the I.T.A.T. order was received on
6/5/2005 and the matter was sent to the Ministry of Law
on 17/6/2005. The draft appeal memo was prepared on
13/7/2005. The draft appeal was returned by the Law
Ministry stating that no approval is necessary. It is
the set out that the last date for filing the appeal
was 2/9/2005. The appeal was filed on 2/6/2006. The
reason given is shortage of stamp papers. Considering
the fact that this averment is not controverted and as
the appeal memo was received on 13/7/2005 and
considering the last date of filing the appeal was
2/9/2005, by which time the draft appeal memo was
ready, in our opinion, the delay needs to be condoned.
Apart from that, on similar issue, other appeal has
been admitted. Hence delay is condoned. Motion is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to
register the appeal.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.