Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1747/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1747/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Infrastructure Leasing And Finance Services Limited

High Court 16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1747/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Infrastructure Leasing And Finance Services Limited
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1747/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S Infrastructure Leasing And Finance Services Limited, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1747 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.950 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1747 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.950 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Infrastructure Leasing & Finance Services Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.S.G.Dalal for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 273 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit in support filed by Mrs.C.K.K.Nair. Respondents has been served. There is no affidavit opposing the same. In the instant case, we find that the I.T.A.T. order was received on 6/5/2005 and the matter was sent to the Ministry of Law on 17/6/2005. The draft appeal memo was prepared on 13/7/2005. The draft appeal was returned by the Law Ministry stating that no approval is necessary. It is the set out that the last date for filing the appeal was 2/9/2005. The appeal was filed on 2/6/2006. The reason given is shortage of stamp papers. Considering the fact that this averment is not controverted and as the appeal memo was received on 13/7/2005 and considering the last date of filing the appeal was 2/9/2005, by which time the draft appeal memo was ready, in our opinion, the delay needs to be condoned. Apart from that, on similar issue, other appeal has been admitted. Hence delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan