Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1754/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1754/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Priti P. Gupta

High Court 03 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1754/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Priti P. Gupta
Date of order
03 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1754/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrs. Priti P. Gupta, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1754 OF 2006 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.736 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant. V/s. Mrs.Priti P. Gupta ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for appellant. Mr.P.R.Toprani for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND R.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- . There is a delay of 60 days in preferring the apppeal. The reasons for the delay is set out in the affidavit of Shri Suni Mathews, Income Tax Officer filed in support of Notice of Motion in para 2. In our opinion, cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. The delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (R.V.MORE, J.) (R.V.MORE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan