In Nma/1755/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13-Mumbai v. M/S. Bipin M. Khandhar., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Needless to mention that failure on the part of the revenue to remove the office objections within the prescribed time, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1755 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3361 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Bipin M Khandhar
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Shivsaran for appellant.
None for respondent.
P.C. :-
1.
behalf of the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. It is brought to our notice that writ petition was filed to challenge the impugned order being Writ Petition No.747 of 2008 which was allowed to be withdrawn thon 7 April, 2008.
2.Since the revenue was prosecuting a remedy in a
wrong forum, the delay caused can be said to be sufficiently explained. Considering the averments made in
the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion, the Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
2.Revenue is directed to remove all office objections in the appeal within 4 weeks from today and get the appeal registered.
3.Needless to mention that failure on the part of the revenue to remove the office objections within the prescribed time, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.