Nma/1766/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City-I v. M/S Air Lins Hotels Pvt Ltd
High Court
05 Sep 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1766/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City-I v. M/S Air Lins Hotels Pvt Ltd
Date of order
05 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1766/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City-I v. M/S Air Lins Hotels Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1766 0F 2005INWEALTH TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.731 OF 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1766 0F 2005
IN
WEALTH TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.731 OF 2005
AND
AND
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1768 0F 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1768 0F 2005
INWEALTH TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.732 OF 2005
IN
WEALTH TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.732 OF 2005
AND
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1873 0F 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1873 0F 2005
IN
IN
WEALTH TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.733 OF 2005
WEALTH TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.733 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.AirLines Hotels Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Atul Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 5TH SEPTENBER, 2007.
DATED : 5TH SEPTENBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 245 days in filing the
appeal. There is affidavit filed in support of the
Motion. From the affidavit, it is clear that the order was received in C.I.T. (A) on 11/6/2004. A scrutiny report was called for and submitted on 21/9/2004.
There is no explanation for the delay between 11/6/2004
and 21/9/2004. Thereafter, the matter was referred to
the Ministry of Law on 7/10/2004 and the appeal was
preferred on 10/6/2005. There is also no explanation
for the said period also.
2. Even otherwise, the tax incidence is less than
Rs.4 lakhs. Considering the cause shown in the
affidavit, it would not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence Motions are dismissed.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.