Nma/1773/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption v. Chetana
High Court
19 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1773/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption v. Chetana
Date of order
19 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/1773/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption v. Chetana, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Sharayu Khot.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1773 OF 2017
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 699 OF 2017
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-ExemptionVersusChetna
…Applicant/ Appellant…Respondent
----------
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Applicant/Appellant.None for the Respondent.----------CORAM :M.S. SANKLECHA &RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.DATE : 19 January 2018
ORDER :
1.This Motion has been taken out for condonation of
1-NMA-1773-17.doc
16 days delay in filing an accompanying Appeal against orderdated 29 July 2016 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal.
2.We have perused the Affidavit of Mr. Rajeev Singh insupport of the Motion dated 14 September 2017 and satisfied bythe reasons indicated therein for the delay. We have alsoperused the additional Affidavit of Mr. Anil Gupta, an Advocate'sClerk, dated 18 January 2018, which states that the time ofremoval of office objection stands extended upto 25 January2018 by the Prothonotary & Senior Master. Thus, the Appeal hasnot been dismissed for non-removal of office objection ascontended on behalf of the Respondent's on the last occasion.
3.In the above view, the Notice of Motion is allowed interms of prayer clause (a).
[RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.