Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1778/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Nma/1778/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai v. Shri. Bharat S. Shah

High Court 21 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1778/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai v. Shri. Bharat S. Shah
Date of order
21 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1778/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai v. Shri. Bharat S. Shah, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1778 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.835 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax, ..AppellantMumbai V/s. Bharat S. Shah..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, advocate, for appellant CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2008 P.C. .The delay in this matter is less than 120days. In our opinion, considering the practicaldifficulties which the department has sought tobring on record and the fact that they are prosecuting the appeal, in our opinion, this wouldbe a fit case to condone the delay. We make itclear that we have condoned the delay consideringthat these are the matters of the year 2007. Wemake it clear that such delays in new matters filedin the year 2008 onwards will have to be properly explained. The respondents can be compensated interms of cost. In the light of the above, delaycondoned subject to the Appellant's paying to therespondents cost quantified at Rs.2500/-. 2.It will be open to the State to recover thecosts from the Officers concerned, if negligence isfound on their part. Notice of Motion disposed ofaccordingly. Office to register the appeal. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan