Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1786/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1786/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -14, Mumbai v. M/S Trade Impex International, Mumbai

High Court 11 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1786/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -14, Mumbai v. M/S Trade Impex International, Mumbai
Date of order
11 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1786/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -14, Mumbai v. M/S Trade Impex International, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1786 of 2008in INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1301 of 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax14.. Appellant M/s Trade Impex International .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMr.Jai Chhabria i/b Ms.Priti Shah for Respondent P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 231 delay caused in filing theappeal. 2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Noticeof motion. It appears that though the last datefor filing the appeal was 11.9.07 and theCommissioner of Income Tax had granted approval on11.9.07 the appeal came to be filed belatedly on30.4.08. Almost 200 days time was taken forgetting the memo of appeal drafted. We are not atall satisfied with the reasons given forcondonation of delay. No sufficient cause is madeout for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice ofmotion stands dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion,Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1301 of 2008 also standsdismissed. {A.V.Nirgude, J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan