Nma/1786/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) v. Prabhakar Patil Education Society
High Court
01 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1786/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) v. Prabhakar Patil Education Society
Date of order
01 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1786/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) v. Prabhakar Patil Education Society, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane
* 1/3 * NMA-1786-2017 (SR.4)Thursday, 1.3.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1786 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2216 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption)….AppellantV/s.Prabhkar Patil EducationSociety ….Respondent
….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the applicant, original appellant.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
DATE :-
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.1ST MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of 201
days delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the
order dated 26th July, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to Assessment Year 2011-12.
Rane
2.
Mr. Walve, appearing for the Revenue, very
fairly states that the reasons given in the affidavit-in-support dated 11[th] September, 2017 of Ms. Sudha Gupta, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax of the Motion seeking condonation of delay of 201 days in this Motion is similar to the one which was given by the very same applicant in Notice of Motion No. 1779 of 2017 in Appeal (L) No. 2320 of 2017 and Notice of Motion No. 1783 of 2017 in Appeal (L) No. 2319 of 2017 which have been dismissed by us today by a speaking order.
3.We have perused the affidavit-in-support of this Motion. We find that except for difference in dates and the period involved herein being 201 days as against 318 days in Notice of Motion No. 1779 of 2017 and 1783 of 2017 the explanation tendered is identical. Therefore, for the reasons indicated in our order today passed in Notice of Motion No. 1779 of 2017 and Notice of Motion No. 1783
Rane
Thursday, 1.3.2018
of 2017 in Appeal (L) Nos. 2320 of 2017 and 2319 of 2017, the present Notice of Motion is also dismissed.
4.In view of dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, Appeal No. 2216 of 2017 does not survive. Accordingly, the same also stands disposed off.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.