Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1786/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Nma/1786/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) v. Prabhakar Patil Education Society

High Court 01 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1786/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) v. Prabhakar Patil Education Society
Date of order
01 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1786/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) v. Prabhakar Patil Education Society, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane * 1/3 * NMA-1786-2017 (SR.4)Thursday, 1.3.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1786 OF 2017 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2216 OF 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption)….AppellantV/s.Prabhkar Patil EducationSociety ….Respondent ….Respondent * * * * * Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the applicant, original appellant. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & DATE :- SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.1ST MARCH, 2018. P.C. :- 1.This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of 201 days delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the order dated 26th July, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to Assessment Year 2011-12. Rane 2. Mr. Walve, appearing for the Revenue, very fairly states that the reasons given in the affidavit-in-support dated 11[th] September, 2017 of Ms. Sudha Gupta, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax of the Motion seeking condonation of delay of 201 days in this Motion is similar to the one which was given by the very same applicant in Notice of Motion No. 1779 of 2017 in Appeal (L) No. 2320 of 2017 and Notice of Motion No. 1783 of 2017 in Appeal (L) No. 2319 of 2017 which have been dismissed by us today by a speaking order. 3.We have perused the affidavit-in-support of this Motion. We find that except for difference in dates and the period involved herein being 201 days as against 318 days in Notice of Motion No. 1779 of 2017 and 1783 of 2017 the explanation tendered is identical. Therefore, for the reasons indicated in our order today passed in Notice of Motion No. 1779 of 2017 and Notice of Motion No. 1783 Rane Thursday, 1.3.2018 of 2017 in Appeal (L) Nos. 2320 of 2017 and 2319 of 2017, the present Notice of Motion is also dismissed. 4.In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Appeal No. 2216 of 2017 does not survive. Accordingly, the same also stands disposed off. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan