Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1798/2005 Of The Commissiioner Of In...

Nma/1798/2005 Of The Commissiioner Of Income-Tax-13 v. M/S Prabhavee

High Court 22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1798/2005 Of The Commissiioner Of Income-Tax-13 v. M/S Prabhavee
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1798/2005 Of The Commissiioner Of Income-Tax-13 v. M/S Prabhavee, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1798 OF 2005IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.792 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1798 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.792 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Prabhavee ..Respondent. Mr.A.S.Rao with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 151 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit in support of the Motion. The cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. We have been condoning the delay upto 200 days. There nothing on record to indicate that the respondent has been served. If the respondent is aggrieved by the order, it is at liberty to apply for the recall of the order. Delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Motion disposed of accordingly. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan