Nma/1798/2005 Of The Commissiioner Of Income-Tax-13 v. M/S Prabhavee
High Court
22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1798/2005 Of The Commissiioner Of Income-Tax-13 v. M/S Prabhavee
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1798/2005 Of The Commissiioner Of Income-Tax-13 v. M/S Prabhavee, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1798 OF 2005IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.792 OF 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1798 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.792 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Prabhavee ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 151 days in preferring
the appeal. There is affidavit in support of the
Motion. The cause shown would amount to sufficient
cause. We have been condoning the delay upto 200 days.
There nothing on record to indicate that the respondent
has been served. If the respondent is aggrieved by the
order, it is at liberty to apply for the recall of the
order. Delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
Motion disposed of accordingly.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.