In Nma/180/2013 Of The Director Of Income Tax (It)-I v. M/S. China Navigation Co. Ltd, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.180 OF 2013
INREVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 75 OF 2012IN
ININCOME TAX APPEAR NO.2113 OF 2009
The Director of Income Tax (IT-1)
Mumbai
… Applicant.
V/s.
M/s China Navigation Co.Ltd.
… Respondent
none for the applicant.
CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.DATE : 15th JANUARY, 2016.
P.C.:
1. This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of delay of 115days in filing Review Petition in respect of order dated 13[th] August,2012.
2. We have perused the affidavit in support of Notice ofMotion and are satisfied with th reasons explained therein whichresulted in the delay. Accordingly the Notice of Motion is allowed interms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
2 nma 180 of 2013.doc
C E R T I F I C A T E
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue