Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1802/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1802/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xxvi, Mumbai v. Mr.keitj Sheldon

High Court 20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1802/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xxvi, Mumbai v. Mr.keitj Sheldon
Date of order
20 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1802/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xxvi, Mumbai v. Mr.keitj Sheldon, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1802 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.778 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant V/s. Mr.Keitj Sheldon ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 20.02.2008 PC 1. This is a motion for condoning 712 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the file was sent to the ministry of law for drafting appeal memo on affidavit-in-support, we find that the file was sent to the ministry of law for drafting appeal memo on 10.5.2005 and the draft appeal was received on 28.10.2006. A period of more than 1 year & 5 months for drafting appeal memo cannot be said to be reasonable. In our view, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.778 OF 2007 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan