Nma/1819/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City- 8 , Mumbai v. Sun-N Sand Hotel P Ltd
High Court
19 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1819/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City- 8 , Mumbai v. Sun-N Sand Hotel P Ltd
Date of order
19 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1819/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City- 8 , Mumbai v. Sun-N Sand Hotel P Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
The Commissioner of Income Tax-City 8 .... Applicantv/s.Sun-N-Sand Hotel P. Ltd..... Respondent
Mr.J.S. Saluja for Applicant.Ms.Beena Pillai for Respondent.
-----
P.C.:
1.Heard learned Counsel for the Revenue. Delay is of 241 days which has not been explained properly. The Notice of Motion is strongly opposed by the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent. During the course of hearing, she pointed out the unexplained delay.days which has not been explained properly. The Notice of Motion is strongly opposed by the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent. During the course of hearing, she pointed out the unexplained delay.
2.Under the aforesaid circumstances, taking overall view of the matter, we do not see any reason to condone the delay. The Notice of Motion is, therefore, rejected.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]
[V.C. DAGA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue