In Nma/1840/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 , Mumbai v. Psl Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Suresh Kumar for Applicant.None for Respondent.----
Heard learned Counsel for the Revenue. In spite of service, nobody is present. Delay of 45 days in filing the Appeal is condoned for the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion. Motion is disposed of.
[J.P. DEVADHAR, J.][V.C. DAGA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.