Nma/1840/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S Tata International Ltd. , Mumbai
High Court
14 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1840/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S Tata International Ltd. , Mumbai
Date of order
14 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1840/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S Tata International Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1837 OF 2012INREVIEW PEITITION (LOD) NO.62 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6559 OF 2011ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1840 OF 2012INREVIEW PEITITION (LOD) NO.61 OF 2011IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.658 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Tata International Ltd.(Formerly Tata Exports Ltd.)
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATED : 14TH JANUARY, 2013
P.C. :-
1.None for the respondent, though served. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notices of Motion, both the Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.The Notices of Motion are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
3.The Review Petitions to come up for hearing after 2 weeks. In the meantime, appellant to serve copies of the Review Petition upon the respondent.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue