Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1842/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Nma/1842/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. Hsbc Bank (Mauritius) Limited

High Court 22 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1842/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. Hsbc Bank (Mauritius) Limited
Date of order
22 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1842/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. Hsbc Bank (Mauritius) Limited, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the delay of 114 days in filing the Appeal is condoned and the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) 3.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* 1/3 * NMA-1842-2017 (SR.4) Thursday, 22.3.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1842 OF 2017 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2202 OF 2017 Commissioner of Income-Tax(IT)-2 ….Applicant (Orig. Appellant) IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Commissioner of Income-Tax (IT)-2….AppellantV/s. HSBC Bank (Mauritius) Ltd.….Respondent * * * * * Mr. Tejveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant. Mr. Niraj Sheth i/by. Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. DATE :-22ND MARCH, 2018. P.C. :- This Notice of Motion has been taken out to Rane * 2/3 * NMA-1842-2017 (SR.4)Thursday, 22.3.2018 condone the delay of 114 days in filing the Appeal from the order dated 16th December, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the tribunal). The application as originally filed seeks condonation of 146 days delay in filing the accompanying Appeal. However, today an Affidavit dated 21st March, 2018 of Mr. Vibhor Badoni, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax has been tendered and it is pointed out that the delay in filing the Appeal is 114 days and due to mistake the period was originally computed from the date of the order of the Tribunal and not from the date of the receipt of the order of the Tribunal. 2. We have perused the Affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion and are satisfied with the reasons mentioned therein for the delay in filing the accompanying Appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 114 days in filing the Appeal is condoned and the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) 3. Needless to state that, the office objections, if Rane any, will be removed within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would be dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan