Nma/1842/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. Hsbc Bank (Mauritius) Limited
High Court
22 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1842/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. Hsbc Bank (Mauritius) Limited
Date of order
22 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1842/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. Hsbc Bank (Mauritius) Limited, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the delay of 114 days in filing the Appeal is condoned and the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) 3.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* 1/3 * NMA-1842-2017 (SR.4)
Thursday, 22.3.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1842 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2202 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income-Tax(IT)-2
….Applicant
(Orig. Appellant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Commissioner of Income-Tax
(IT)-2….AppellantV/s.
HSBC Bank (Mauritius) Ltd.….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Tejveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
Mr. Niraj Sheth i/by. Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE :-22ND MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :-
This Notice of Motion has been taken out to
Rane
* 2/3 * NMA-1842-2017 (SR.4)Thursday, 22.3.2018
condone the delay of 114 days in filing the Appeal from the order dated 16th December, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the tribunal). The application as originally filed seeks condonation of 146 days delay in filing the accompanying Appeal. However, today an Affidavit dated 21st March, 2018 of Mr. Vibhor Badoni, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax has been tendered and it is pointed out that the delay in filing the Appeal is 114 days and due to mistake the period was originally computed from the date of the order of the Tribunal and not from the date of the receipt of the order of the Tribunal.
2. We have perused the Affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion and are satisfied with the reasons mentioned therein for the delay in filing the accompanying Appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 114 days in filing the Appeal is condoned and the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a)
3. Needless to state that, the office objections, if
Rane
any, will be removed within a period of 4 weeks from
today failing which the Appeal would be dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.