In Nma/1865/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -25 Mumbai v. Harshad P. Doshi, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the circumstances, we have no option but to dismiss the motion.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1865 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1216 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax.
... Appellant.
V/s.
Harshad P. Doshi.
... Respondent.
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Ms.Madhavi Tavanandi for the respondent.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ.DATED : 18[th] October 2010.
P.C.:
According to the respondent, the present notice of motion is delayed by more than 5 months. There is no prayer for condonation of delay. Consequently, there is no explanation for delay. In the circumstances, we have no option but to dismiss the motion. Notice of motion is, thus, dismissed as barred by limitation with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue