Nma/1877/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Garware Synthetics P. Ltd
High Court
09 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1877/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Garware Synthetics P. Ltd
Date of order
09 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1877/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Garware Synthetics P. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1877 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.672 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Applicant.
V/s.
M/s.Garware Synthetics P. Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the applicant.
Mr.A.K. Jasani with Mr.P.Y. Vaidya for the
respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 9TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. In support of the affidavit for condonation
of delay, it is pointed out that the approval for
preferring Appeal was granted on 8th January, 2007.
The Appeal Memo was received on 27th January, 2004
i.e. nearly after one year and the Appeal was filed
on 3rd June, 2004 i.e. nearly after five months. No
explanation has been given for both the long delay in
the Ministry of Law as also as to why the Appeal was
not preferred after draft Appeal Memo was received.
In our opinion, cause shown would not amount to
sufficient cause.
2. The notice of motion is dismissed.
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue