In Nma/1879/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Hiranandani Foundation, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SKN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1879 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1440 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax-Exemption.…Applicant.V/s.Hiranandani Foundation.…Respondent.
Ms.Priyanka Tiwari i/b. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the applicant.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND A.K.MENON, JJ.DATE :29[th] November 2017.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that notice of motion has been served on the respondent. We accept the statement. Affidavit of service to be filed within two weeks.
In view of averments made in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay of 37 days. Hence, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.K.MENON, J.)
(A.S.OKA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.