Nma/1881/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S Ganesh Computronics Pvt. Ltd
High Court
25 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1881/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S Ganesh Computronics Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
25 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1881/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S Ganesh Computronics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1881 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1881 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1881 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1108 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1108 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Ganesh Computronics P.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr.A.R.Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 25th September, 2008
DATE : 25th September, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this
Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation
of 295 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. Perused
the judgment of this Court passed in the Notice of
Motion No.2281 of 2008 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1814
of 2008 and the other connected matters. Also perused
the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For
the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the
Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for
condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the
Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute
in terms of prayer clause (a).
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.