Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1893/2015 Of M/S. M.g. Saraf (Huf) v...

Nma/1893/2015 Of M/S. M.g. Saraf (Huf) v. Jiont Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 10

High Court 15 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1893/2015 Of M/S. M.g. Saraf (Huf) v. Jiont Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 10
Date of order
15 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1893/2015 Of M/S. M.g. Saraf (Huf) v. Jiont Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 10, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1893 OF 2015 INREVIEW PETITION NO.61 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1119 OF 2011. Mr. M.G. Saraf … Applicant. V/s.Jt. Commissioner of IT… Respondent Mr. Nivaj Seth, a/w Ms. Shweta Jaydev, I/by Federal & Rashoikant, forthe applicant. Mr. A.R. Malhotra, and N.A. Kazi, for respondent. CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.DATE : 15th JANUARY, 2016. P.C.: 1. This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of 4 days delay infiling Review Petition. 2. We have perused the affidavit in support and are satisfiedwith the reasons set out. Accordingly Notice of Motion is allowed interms of prayer clause (a). [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.] 9 NM 1893 OF 2015.doc C E R T I F I C A T E Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan