Case LawHigh Court › Nma/190/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of...

Nma/190/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Tata Steel Ltd

High Court 16 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/190/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Tata Steel Ltd
Date of order
16 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/190/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Tata Steel Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Rane * 1/2 * NMA—190-2018 (SR. 24)Friday, 16.3.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 190 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2302 OF 2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-2 ….Applicant (Orig. Appellant) IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-2 ….AppellantV/s.M/s. Tata Steel Ltd.PAN No. ….Respondent * * * * * Ms. Swapna Gokhale i/by. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant. Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala i/by. PDS Legal, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-16TH MARCH, 2018. P.C. :- 1.This application seeks condonation of 25 days Rane delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the order dated 3[rd] February, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal). 2.We have perused the Affidavit dated 15th February, 2018 of Mr. P. Saikrishna, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, in support of the Motion.We are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing the accompanying Appeal. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The applicant is directed to remove office 3. The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan