Nma/1902/2015 Of Mr. M.g. Saraf v. Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 9
High Court
15 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1902/2015 Of Mr. M.g. Saraf v. Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 9
Date of order
15 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/1902/2015 Of Mr. M.g. Saraf v. Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 9, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1902 OF 2015
INREVIEW PETITION NO.60 OF 2015
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1120 OF 2011
Mr. M.G. Saraf
… Applicant.
V/s.
Jt. Commissioner of IT… Respondent
Mr. Nivaj Seth, a/w Ms. Shweta Jaydev, I/by Federal & Rashoikant, forthe applicant.
Mr. A.R. Malhotra, and N.A. Kazi, for respondent.
CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 15th JANUARY, 2016.
P.C.:
1. This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of 4 days delay in
filing Review Petition.
2. We have perused the affidavit in support and are satisfied
with the reasons set out. Accordingly Notice of Motion is allowed in
terms of prayer clause (a).
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
9 NM 1902 OF 2015.doc
C E R T I F I C A T E
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue