In Nma/1906/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 10 Mumbai v. Infrastructure Leasing And Financial Servicves Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2363 OF 2007 WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1906 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-... Appellant.
V/s.
Infrastructure Leasing And Financial Services Ltd.... Respondent.
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.thDATED : 7 July 2009.
P.C. :
The earlier order dated 7th May, 2009 is self-operative. The order has already operated since the said order was conditional and the conditions have not been complied with by the appellant. Appeal has already been dismissed.
In view of dismissal of appeal, notice of motion does not survive. The same stands dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue