Nma/1932/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S Dagger Forst Tools Ltd
High Court
26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1932/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S Dagger Forst Tools Ltd
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1932/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S Dagger Forst Tools Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Once the issue on merits is not an issue before this Court, the question as framed would be clearly academic and hence Motion alongwith Appeal stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1932 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1076 OF 2007
The CIT City-3 ..Appellants
V/s.
M/s.Dagger Forest Tools Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta and P.S.Sahadevan for the appellants.
Mr.S.J.Mehta i/by S.P.Mehta for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26.02.2008.
PC
1. Revenue was in appeal before the ITAT. There
are 2 questions of law. The first issue was on
merits and the second issue was a matter of
re-opening. The learned Tribunal found that on
merits, the Commissioner (Appeals) has relied on the
judgment of this Court in CIT V/s. Bhor Industries
reported in 264 ITR 180. In this appeal appellants
have not challenged the finding by the Tribunal on
that count. The issue before this Court is only a
matter of re-opening. Once the issue on merits is
not an issue before this Court, the question as
framed would be clearly academic and hence Motion
alongwith Appeal stand dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.