Nma/1934/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S Blue Dart Express Ltd
High Court
16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1934/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S Blue Dart Express Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1934/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S Blue Dart Express Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1934 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.862 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1934 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.862 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Blue Dart Express Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with P.P.Bhosale for appellant.
Mr.P.S.Tripati for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 274 days in preferring
the appeal. There is a an affidavit in support. The
I.T.A.T. order dated 15/2/2005 was received on
13/4/2005. The Chief CIT’s granted approval on
20/7/2005 and the file was sent to the Ministry of Law on 22/7/2005. The last date for filing the appeal was 10/8/2005. It is then pointed out that litigation
matters were taken over by the department from Ministry
of Law with effect from 1/12/2005, Advocate had to be
appointed and procedural delay has been explained till
the filing of the appeal on 11/5/2006. Considering the
cause shown in the affidavit of Mr.Arun V.Umate, in our
opinion, the same would amount to sufficient cause.
Hence delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the
appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.