Nma/1946/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 Mumbai v. Allana Sons Ltd
High Court
06 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1946/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 Mumbai v. Allana Sons Ltd
Date of order
06 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1946/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 Mumbai v. Allana Sons Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Under these circumstances, we have no hesitation to dismiss the Notice of Motion.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1946 OF 2009WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1454 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.M/s.Allana Sons Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr.Jitendra Singh i/b. Joy Legal Consulants for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 6TH JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel for the respondent. Revenue is seeking condonation of delay. Revenue is seeking condonation of delay of about 401 days delay in filing the appeal. Affidavit in support of notice of motion is filed. However, the prayer for condonation of delay is strongly opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent. He contends that the delay from April, 2007 to May, 2008 i.e. more than one year has not been properly explained. We concur with the submissions made by learned counsel of the respondent. No material is placed on record to satisfactorily explain the delay. No sufficient case is made out to condone the delay. Under these circumstances, we have no hesitation to dismiss the Notice of Motion.
2.Needless to mention that in view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the appeal papers be consigned to record.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.