Nma/196/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
26 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/196/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
26 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/196/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, Mumbai v. M/S The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: However, we direct that within a period of FOUR WEEKS from today all office objections shall be removed, failing which the earlier self operative order will stand.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
kps
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.196 OF 2012ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6087 OF 2010
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.223 OF 2012
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4833 OF 2010
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.224 OF 2012
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4830 OF 2010
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.225 OF 2012ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6089 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-5.-Versus-M/s The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited.
..Applicant/Appellant
..Respondents
...........
Mr.N.C.Mohanty with Ms.Padma Divakar, for the Applicant.Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.A.K.Jasani, for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE :- 26[th] September, 2014
P.C.:
Having heard both sides and finding that the allegations
nma.196.223.224.225.12.1.2.3.4.group
made against the Advocate in paragraph 6 of the affidavit in support have been withdrawn that in the larger interest of public we restore the Appeals to the file of this Court. However, we direct that within a period of FOUR WEEKS from today all office objections shall be removed, failing which the earlier self operative order will stand. The Notices of Motion are, accordingly, disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.