Nma/1966/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- (Exemption), Pune v. Thermax Social Initiative Foundation
High Court
12 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1966/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- (Exemption), Pune v. Thermax Social Initiative Foundation
Date of order
12 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/1966/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- (Exemption), Pune v. Thermax Social Initiative Foundation, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1966 OF 2017
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2478 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemptions), Pune In the matter betweenCommissioner of Income Tax(Exemptions), Pune
v/s. Thermax Social Initiative Foundation, Pune
.. Applicant
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Sham Walve for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.J.
DATED : 12[th] JANUARY, 2018.
1.This notice of motion has been taken out for condonation of 82 days delay in filing an appeal from the order dated 22[nd] December,
2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.We have perused affidavit of Mr. S.M. Kulkarni, Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Ward-1, Pune dated 28[th] September 2017 in support of this motion and find that the reasons given therein warrant condonation of delay.
3.Accordingly, the motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue