Nma/2045/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd
High Court
22 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2045/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2045/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2045 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.722 OF 2006The Commissioner of Income tax-2...Appellant.Vs.Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd...Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.B.Bhosale & P.S.Sahadevanfor the Appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi & Mr. D. Vyas for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 22ND JANUARY,2008.
PC :
period of four weeks from today. Office to number the
appeal and list the same for admission.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Mr.P.C.Tripathi & Mr. D. Vyas for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 22ND JANUARY,2008.
PC :
period of four weeks from today. Office to number the
appeal and list the same for admission.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue