Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2087/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2087/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Metal Extruders Pvt.ltd

High Court 05 Dec 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2087/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Metal Extruders Pvt.ltd
Date of order
05 Dec 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/2087/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Metal Extruders Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Notice of Motion No.2087 of 2004 In Appeal (L) No.844 of 2004 W i t h Notice of Motion No.2089 of 2004 In Appeal (L) No.843 of 2004 The CIT-9 .. .. Applicant v/s. M/s.Metal Extruders Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.A.M.Kontangale for applicant. Ms.Aasifa Khan for respondent. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 5th December 2006 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The above two Motions are taken out by the Revenue for condonation of delay in filing the above Appeals. In both the Motions the delay sought to be condoned is of 58 days. 3. The Appeals are directed against the order of the Tribunal for the Assessment years 1987-88 and 1988-89. The explanation has been given in the supporting Affidavits. We accept the explanation. Ms.Khan appearing for the respondent has opposed the condonation. Even so considering -2- the explanation given in the Affidavits, we grant both these Motions. Delay condoned in both the Motions. Appeals be numbered. 4. Both the Motions disposed of. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan