In Nma/2087/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13,Mumbai v. Mr. Hakimuddin I. Penwala, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
recover the costs from the officer responsible for
causing the delay.
3. It is also made clear that if the respondent has grievance relating to non effecting of service of
Notice of motion, he is at liberty to apply for recall
of this order.
anythis
( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue