In Nma/2090/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax.,Central-Ii Mumbai v. Subhalaxmi Investment Co, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2090 OF 2002.
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 601 OF 2002.
Shri Pankaj Kapoor for the appellant.
Shri A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
P.C.
1. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay
in presenting the appeal is condoned. Motion is
allowed. Office to register the appeal and place it
for admission in due course.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
********
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue