Nma/209/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 30 v. Ester-Lub Technologies
High Court
12 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/209/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 30 v. Ester-Lub Technologies
Date of order
12 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/209/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 30 v. Ester-Lub Technologies, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Therefore, in view of the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th ]December, 2015, the motion is being withdrawn and the appeal is also rendered infructuous as it already stands rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 209 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 750 OF 2015
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-30
.. Applicant
In the matter betweenPr. Commissioner of Income Tax-30
.. Appellant
v/s.
Ester-Lub Technologies
.. Respondent
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Arun Upadhyay for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 12[th ]APRIL, 2018.
1.This notice of motion has been taken up to condone the delay of 746 days in seeking to set aside the order dated 8[th] October, 2015 rejecting the applicant's appeal under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules.
2.Mr. Pinto, learned Counsel appearing in support of the motion
states that he has been instructed to withdraw the motion as the tax effect involved in the accompanying appeal is Rs.13.86 lakhs.
3.Therefore, in view of the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th ]December, 2015, the motion is being withdrawn and the appeal is also rendered infructuous as it already stands rejected.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.