Nma/2116/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. Bina Sahni
High Court
22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2116/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. Bina Sahni
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2116/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. Bina Sahni, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2116 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2116 OF 2006
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1084 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1084 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Smt. Bina Sahni ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Mahesh Menon i/b.Mahesh Menon & Co. for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 377 days in preferring
the appeal. There is affidavit in support of the
Motion. The order of the I.T.A.T. dated 29/9/2004 was
received by the CIT-12 on 18/2/2005. After various
steps, the Chief CIT granted approval on 25/4/2005.
The last date of filing the appeal was 17/6/2005. The
file was sent to the Ministry of Law on 25/4/2005. The
draft appeal memo was received on 2/6/2006. The appeal
was filed on 28/6/2006. There is absolutely no
explanation whatsoever for the delay between 25/4/2005
and 2/6/2006. Considering the cause shown, in our
opinion, the same would not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.