Case Law › High Court › Nma/2126/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2126/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 Mumbai v. Krishna Kumar Pittie

High Court 19 Dec 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Dec 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/2126/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 Mumbai v. Krishna Kumar Pittie, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2126 OF 2011INREVIEW PETITION (L) NO.65 OF 2011IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6867 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-10-Versus-Krishna Kumar Pittie ..Applicant ..Respondent ........... Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Applicant.None for the Respondent. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE :- 19[th] DECEMBER, 2014 P.C.: For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support, the delay of 30 days in filing the Review Petition is condoned. The Review Petition may now be numbered after removal of office objection and placed for admission. (A. A. SAYED, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.