Nma/2150/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Tds
High Court
15 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2150/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Tds
Date of order
15 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/2150/2015 Of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Tds, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2150 OF 2015
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.V/s.
… Applicant.
Commissioner of IT-TDS
… Respondent
Ms. Priti Patel I/by Shukla & Associates, for the applicant. Mrs. P.C. Chotaranx, for the respondent,.
CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 15th JANUARY, 2016.
P.C.:
1.This Notice of Motion seeks to set aside the order dated 6[th]
August, 2015, passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master rejecting
their appeal under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court Original SideRules.
2. We have perused the affidavit in support of Motion and findthat the objections had been removed before 3[rd] September, 2015 asspecified in the order dated 6[th] August, 2015. However, in view ofpending Notice of Motion No.941, the appeal was not numbered andregistered.
3. In above circumstances, Notice of Motion is allowed interms of prayer clause (a).
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
7 NMAL 2150 OF 2015.doc
C E R T I F I C A T E
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.