In Nma/2226/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 Mumbai v. Tech Pacific I Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2226 OF 2010INNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1297 OF 2009 IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.310 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Tech Pacific (I) Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. J.S. Saluja for appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
R.M. SAVANT, JJ.
DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Notice of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of 207 days. By consent of the parties, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(R.M. SAVANT, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue