Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2233/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, Ci...

Nma/2233/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-14, Mumbai v. Company

High Court 06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2233/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-14, Mumbai v. Company
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/2233/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-14, Mumbai v. Company, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2233 OF 2003 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.730 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2233 OF 2003 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.730 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant. V/s. N.V. Company ..Respondent. Mr.A.N. Kotangale with P.S. Sahadevan for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, it is clear that there is no case of inaction, negligent or want of bonafides on the part of the applicant. Hence notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Appeal be numbered and placed for admission after 2 weeks. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan