Nma/2233/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-14, Mumbai v. Company
High Court
06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2233/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-14, Mumbai v. Company
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2233/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-14, Mumbai v. Company, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2233 OF 2003 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.730 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2233 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.730 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
N.V. Company ..Respondent.
Mr.A.N. Kotangale with P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the respondent. Perused the affidavit in support
of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated
therein, it is clear that there is no case of inaction,
negligent or want of bonafides on the part of the
applicant. Hence notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Appeal be numbered and placed for admission
after 2 weeks.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.