Nma/2249/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. Afcons Infrastrucsture Ltd
High Court
06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2249/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. Afcons Infrastrucsture Ltd
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/2249/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. Afcons Infrastrucsture Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the disposal of the appeal, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2249 OF 2003 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.742 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.742 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.N.Kotangale with P.S. Sahderan for appellant.
Mr.S.P.Mehta for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks
leave to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is allowed to
be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
2. In view of the disposal of the appeal, the
Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
3. Court fees be refunded as per rules.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue