Nma/2253/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. In House Production Pvt. Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2253/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. In House Production Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2253/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. In House Production Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed, appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Mr.A.D. Kango and Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.A.R.Singh with P.S.Savla for the Respondent.
PC :
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 29TH JANUARY,2008.
not sufficient cause and consequently the notice of
motion stands dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Mr. A.D.Kango and Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr. A.R.Singh & Paras Savla for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 15TH JANUARY,2008.
PC :
1. As the motion for condonation of delay is dismissed,
appeal is dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue