Nma/2269/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City-9,Mum v. Abode Construction Ltd
High Court
22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2269/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City-9,Mum v. Abode Construction Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2269/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-City-9,Mum v. Abode Construction Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2269 0F 2005 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.870 OF 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2269 0F 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.870 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Abode Constructions Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mrs.Lund i/b. Lata Desai, Pallavi Divek for
respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Delay is less than 200 days. Considering the
practical difficulties which the Department was facing
including referring the matters to the Law Department,
Government of India for drafting the appeal memo and
considering the affidavit in support of the notice of
Motion, in our opinion, cause shown would amount to
sufficient cause. Hence delay condoned. The Motion is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to
register the appeal.
Motion disposed of accordingly.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.