Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2280/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2280/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 Mumbai v. Ultramarine And Pigments Ltd

High Court 08 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2280/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 Mumbai v. Ultramarine And Pigments Ltd
Date of order
08 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/2280/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 Mumbai v. Ultramarine And Pigments Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

PGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION The Commissioner of Income-taxv/s.M/s.Ultramarine & Pigments Ltd. ... Appellant ... Respondent Mr.Hiro Rai with Mr.S.S.Shetty and Mr.Mandar Vaidya for Respondent. ----- SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED : 8[th] March 2011 1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan