Nma/230/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5, Mumbai v. M/S The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
13 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/230/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5, Mumbai v. M/S The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
13 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/230/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -5, Mumbai v. M/S The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: However, we direct that within a period of four weeks from today all office objections shall be removed, failing which the earlier self operative order will stand.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.230 OF 2012ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.996 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-5
..Applicant
-Versus-M/s. The Great Eastern Shipping Co.Ltd.
..Respondent
...........
Mr. Nirmal Chandre Mohanty for the Applicant.
Mr. Atul Jasani for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND
A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE :- 13[th] NOVEMBER, 2014
P.C.:
Having heard both sides and finding that the allegations made against the Advocate in paragraph 6 of the affidavit in support have been withdrawn that in the larger interest of public we restore the Appeals to the file of this Court. However, we direct that within a period of four weeks from today all office objections shall be removed, failing which the earlier self operative order will stand. The Notice of Motion is, accordingly, disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.
(A. A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue