Nma/2309/2016 Of Cifco Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1)(3)
High Court
30 Sep 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2309/2016 Of Cifco Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1)(3)
Date of order
30 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2309/2016 Of Cifco Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1)(3), the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2309 OF 2016
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1078 OF 2016
Mr. Sameer Dalal for the applicant / original appellant None for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
S.C. GUPTE, J.J.
DATED : 30[th] SEPTEMBER, 2016.
1.None appears on behalf of the respondent Revenue inspite of service.
2.The present Notice of Motion has been taken out for condonation of 15 days delay in filing accompanying appeal from the order dated 2[nd] March, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
3.We have perused the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of the present Notice of Motion for the delay in filing the accompanying appeal. We are satisfied with the reasons set out therein.
4.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A).
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue