In Nma/2313/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S Reliance Capital Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Mr.P.J.Pardiwala with Mr. Rajesh Shah for theRespondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 11TH DECEMBER,2007.
P.C.
1. Heard both parties.
Notice of motion is therefore, allowed and the delay filing the appeal stands condoned subject to payment costs of Rs.2500/- which is to be paid directly to respondent within a period of six weeks from today. is made clear that the department will be at liberty
recover the costs from the officer responsible for
causing the delay.
( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I. REBELLO, J.)
inoftheItto
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue