Nma/2323/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Anuchit Traders Pvt. Ltd
High Court
04 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2323/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Anuchit Traders Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
04 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2323/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Anuchit Traders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2323 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.857 OF 2007
The CIT-3 ..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Anuchit Traders Pvt.Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 4th March, 2008.
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 1074 days delay
in filing the appeal. A perusal of
affidavit-in-support indicates that the scrutiny
report was received in the office of jurisdictional
CIT on 25.2.2004 but the file was thereafter sent to
a Counsel for drafting after more than 2 years & 12
months later on 22.12.2006. The delay caused
between the aforesaid period has not been properly
explained. In our view, therefore, the cause shown
does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion
dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.857 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.857 OF 2007
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.