Case Law › High Court › Nma/2327/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2327/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xxii, Mumbai v. Dedhia Hsg. Corpn

High Court 11 Apr 2005 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Apr 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/2327/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xxii, Mumbai v. Dedhia Hsg. Corpn, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2327 OF 2002. IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.682 OF 2002. Shri Pankaj Kapoor for the appellant. Shri A.Singh for the respondent. CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & CORAM: V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 11-4-2005. DATED: 11-4-2005. DATED: 11-4-2005. P.C. 1. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, delay of 4 days in presenting the appeal is condoned. Office to register the appeal and place it for admission in due course. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) ********

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.