Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2358/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2358/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Patel Roadways Ltd

High Court 03 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2358/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Patel Roadways Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/2358/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Patel Roadways Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2358 OF 2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.959 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant. V/s. Patel Roadways. Ltd. .Respondent. Mr.A.Kotangale for appellant. Mr.P.R.Toprani for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND R.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 85 days in preferring the appeal. Shri R.V.Reddy, Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax has filed an affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay and various steps taken therein have been set out. A reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent opposing the condontion of delay. 2. Considering what is set out in the affidavit of Shri Reddy, in our opinion cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (R.V.MORE, J.) (R.V.MORE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan